Subject: Re: Participation in Q.11,13/17 email meeting
From: Edel Mary Sherratt (eds#aber.ac.uk)
Date: Tue Apr 25 2006 - 10:54:42 GMT
Dear Rick,
Sorry for being slow.
I have focused on Z109 Chapters 5 and 7 and have a few small proposals.
What is the protocol for submitting these for discussion?
Edel
Rick Reed TSE wrote:
>Dear Colleagues,
>
>I have made several documents available for this meeting and posted emails
>to the meeting.
>
>We are now approaching the announced end of the meeting and so far I seem to
>be the only person who has provided any technical input for the meeting. Is
>anyone else reading these emails?? Do I assume that everyone on the list has
>a spam filter that prevents them from seeing my emails, or should I assume
>that there is a spam filter somewhere that is stopping me seeing emails from
>others??
>
>I have proposed to the other Question rapporters and WP3 participants that
>we continue the meeting for another 7 days, but currently I am being asked
>for the report and action plan from the meeting for
>Tues, 18 Apr 2006 09:00:00 +0100
>
>One email I sent was on the eODL discussions.
>
>My conclusion from the lack of response is to:
>
>1. Forward the Implementers guide for eODL TD3167r1 for WP3, SG17 approval
>
>2. Forward Z.130 Annex E: TD3168r1 for WP3, SG17 consent PROVIDED the A.5
>justification document is submitted, otherwise refer to WP3 for discussion
>on how to handle this document.
>
>3. Forward the Review of eODL study TD3172 to WP3, SG17 for approval of the
>included Q.11/17 revision.
>
>--
>Rick Reed - rickreed#tseng.co.uk
>Tel:+44 15394 88462 Mob.:+44 7970 50 96 50
>Skype: rickreed_windermere
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a23 : Mon May 05 2008 - 20:30:55 GMT