Subject: Re: SDL-2000 editorial note:
Mariusz Kupiec at spec3gpp#interia.pl wrote on 16/03/2002 11:14:
> <composite special> ::=
You are correct (of course), and in fact there is an error SDL-2000
Strictly current definitive version is the ITU Version Z.100(11/99) with
However, the SDL Forum has also published (for members only) a version (both
Earlier this month ITU-T started approval of an updated version of Z.100 and
The draft versions of these revised documents have been made available to
The error you reported is in this document and therefore still needs fixing.
Which version of the SDL-2000 standard did you find the error in?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a23
: Mon May 05 2008 - 20:30:55 GMT
From: Rick Reed TSE (rickreed#tseng.co.uk)
Date: Sun Mar 17 2002 - 18:21:40 GMT
>
> | <result sign>
> < ----------- no need for alternative in BNF description
>
definition here.
corrections as defined by Z.100(11/99) Corrigendum 1 (12/01).
as a PDF and an MS Word file) that consolidates these two documents (and
adds some other useful features). In practice this is normally taken as the
authoritative version.
the associated Z.106 document. The changes have been to incorporate
Corrigendum 1 into the ITU document (achieved by starting from the SDL Forum
document) and moving the parts of the grammar only used in SDL/PR to Z.106.
The result will be that the revised Z.100 describes the version of Z.100
used by most users (the graphical form).
ITU-T SG17 members, and will be distributed by the ITU for approval soon.
The current draft is in ITU-T SG17 TD3021Rev2.doc.
Such editorial corrections can be made during the approval process.
--
Rick Reed - rickreed#tseng.co.uk
Tel:+44 1455 55 96 55 Fax:+44 1455 55 96 58 Mob.:+44 7970 50 96 50