Subject: SDL-News: Re: VERILOG Comments on Exception handling
From: Anders Olsen (anders#tdr.dk )
Date: Fri Jun 26 1998 - 12:08:00 GMT
The originator of this message is responsible for its content.
-----From anders#tdr.dk (Anders Olsen) to sdlnews -----
I understand your concern that exception handling adds overhead during execution,
but I think it is difficult to avoid overhead with exception. This is also a wellknown
problem in C++. But I think that if exception handling must be resolved statically,
the real power of exception handling is lost. Most C++ compilers can switch off
exception handling, the same could be done in the SDL tools.
If exception handling is solved statically, how should progation from (possible remote)
procedures be handled?
-----End text from anders#tdr.dk (Anders Olsen) to sdlnews -----
For help, email "majordomo#sdl-forum.org" with the body of your email as:
or (iff this does not answer your question) email: owner-sdlnews#sdl-forum.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a23 : Sun Jun 16 2013 - 10:41:40 GMT