Subject: Re: SDL-News: Exported Variables
From: Martin v. Loewis (loewis#informatik.hu-berlin.de)
Date: Tue Dec 16 1997 - 13:15:27 GMT
The originator of this message is responsible for its content.
-----From "Martin v. Loewis" <loewis#informatik.hu-berlin.de> to sdlnews -----
> To me, the use of remote variables should not be consistent with
> resolving by context, as remote variables never are solved by context
> (they never occurs in expressions). Rather, it should be consistent with
> other usage of remote variables. Therefore, I think that the main
> text of Z.100 should be changed.
This is also consistent with remote procedures, so I would also
prefer this change.
> dcl exported var integer;
> should be a shorthand for
> dcl exported var as var integer;
Is this shorthand indeed valid in all cases? For example,
dcl exported var integer;
is a valid SDL(96) specification, introducing an implicit
remote variable. However, the specification
dcl exported var as var integer;
would be in error, since there is no remote var.
-----End text from "Martin v. Loewis" <loewis#informatik.hu-berlin.de> to sdlnews -----
For help, email "majordomo#sdl-forum.org" with the body of your email as:
or (iff this does not answer your question) email: owner-sdlnews#sdl-forum.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a23 : Sun Jun 16 2013 - 10:41:40 GMT